← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/526/2017disposed off

Shree Raj Shrushti Residency Pvt Limited v. M/S. Jayems Engineering Co Pvt Ltd. And ORS.

2017-02-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar2 pages

23-WP-526-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 526 OF 2017 Shree Raj Shrushti Residency Pvt Limited

...Petitioner

Versus

M/s. Jayems Engineering Co Pvt Ltd. & Ors.

...Respondents

---------- Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar, for the Petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Dani, Senior Advocate, a/w Ms. Neeta Solanki and Mr. Rajan Yadav, i/b Kiran Jain & Co., for the Respondent No. 2. ---------- CORAM :

N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 8 February 2017 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

It is not necessary to interfere with the impugned order, as the learned Small Causes Court, Judge has merely directed the Petitioner-Plaintiff to file an appropriate application by next date. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that Sharayu.

1/2

23-WP-526-17.doc the Application as contemplated in the impugned order is already filed. The learned Judge has not foreclosed the rights of the parties on merits and learned Judge will no doubt consider the Application filed by the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned order on its own merits. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. [N.M. JAMDAR, J.] Sharayu.

2/2