Ashok Ramkumar Tiwari v. The Superitendent Yerawada Central Prison And ORS

jdk 1 5.cri.wp.172.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.WRIT PETITION NO. 172 OF 2014 Ashok Ramkumar Tiwari .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....

None present for the Petitioner Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State ....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J. & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

DATED : JANUARY 21, 2016 ORAL ORDER: [PER THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] :

Petitioner has preferred this petition through jail, hence, we appoint advocate Ms. Rohini Dandekar who is on the panel of the High Court Legal Services Committee, to represent the petitioner in this petition.

Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith and petition is taken up for final hearing.

The grievance of the petitioner in the application and in the petition is that his application for parole came to be

jdk 2 5.cri.wp.172.14.doc rejected, hence, this petition.

The learned A.P.P. has produced the report of the Additional Senior Superintendent of Yerawada Central Prison, Pune, which shows that the petitioner has been acquitted by this Court, hence, the petitioner has been released from the prison. The said report is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition and the petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. Legal fees of appointed advocate be paid as per Rules. [ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ] kandarkar