Vignesh Battule v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2020 Mr. Vignesh Battule .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mrs. J. S. Lohokare, APP for State/Respondent. ______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 25th MARCH, 2021 P.C. :

1.

This matter is placed before this court for speaking to the minutes of order dated 07/07/2020. In the title, name of the applicant is wrongly typed. Instead of '

Mr. Vignesh Battule' it is typed as 'Mrs. Sakhrabai H. Dhawale'

. It is a typographical error. It should be correctly mentioned as '

Mr. Vignesh Battule'

.

Corresponding to this correction, in the first line of paragraph No.3, instead of word 'her' it should be 'his' .

2.

Correction be made accordingly.

3.

Rest of the order shall remain as it is.

4.

Corrected order be uploaded.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) CORRECTED ORDER DATED 07th JULY, 2020 READS THUS:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2020 Mr. Vignesh Battule .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mr. Ranjeet Pawar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Sharmila Kaushik, APP for the State/Respondent. ______ CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE :07th JULY, 2020 P.C. :

1.

After arguing for some time, when I expressed my disinclination to grant relief, learned Counsel for the Applicant

prays for unconditional withdrawal of this application. 2.

Permission granted. Application is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally.

3.

It is clarified that if the Applicant surrenders, his bail application shall be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the order of withdrawal of this Anticipatory Bail Application.

4.

Application is disposed of accordingly.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)