Mohd. Ejaj Chandsaheb Kanul v. The State Of Maha. Thr. Minority Development Dept. And ANR

6-WP.1741.2023 jvs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1741 OF 2023 Mohd. Ejaj Chandsaheb Kanul } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. } Respondents Mr. Machhindra A. Patil for the petitioner.

Mr. R. P. Kadam, AGP for State.

CORAM:

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE:

FEBRUARY 16, 2023 P.C.:

1.

The learned advocate for the petitioner is present. 2.

The petitioner seeks directions to decide the review. No provision is referred to under which the review is filed. Review is available only if the same is authorized by the statute. In light of that, no further orders are necessary. It is for the petitioner to pursue the remedy available under law.

3.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) SALUNKE J V by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.02.17 14:58:39 +0530