Anand Jagdish Agrawal And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

Tilak (1)ABA-66-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2016 Anand Jagdish Agrawal & Ors.

...

Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent .....

Mr.Ashish Raghuvanshi, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.Ghanshyam Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent no.2. Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent/State. ....

CORAM :

P. N. DESHMUKH J.

DATED :

2nd AUGUST 2016.

P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP and learned counsel for original complainant.

Also perused the consent terms placed on record. Contents of consent terms are agreed by the parties present in the Court to be truly recorded, and has accordingly, signed the same. It also bears signature of learned Advocates for the applicants as well as respondent no.2/complainant. Consent terms and affidavit is taken on record. In view of terms of settlement on record, interim protection granted to Anand Agrawal vide order dated 15th January 2016 stands confirmed.

Application is disposed of as allowed.

(P. N. DESHMUKH J.) 1/1