Suresh S/O Pranjeevandas Dani And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

49 wp 211-19=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 211 OF 2019 Mr. Suresh S/o. Pranjivandas Dani and Anr.

... Petitioners V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ---------------- Mr. Ashok Saraogi for the Petitioners.

Mr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent.

---------------- CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 06th FEBRUARY, 2019 P.C.:

1.

Petitioners are present with their Counsel, Respondent No.2 and Shri. Bharat Kumar, Partner of Respondent No.3 firm are present. Advocate of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Mr. Anil Mishra is not available, however they are identified by Petitioners and their Counsel. Petitioners' Counsel firmly states that as compromise is reached at his office, he knows Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. We accept this statement.

2.

It appears that Petitioners had filed S.C. Suit (St) No. 967 of 2018 in City Civil Court at Dindoshi and therein Consent Terms were arrived at. Accepting those Consent Terms, suit is already disposed of.

Sneha Chavan 1/2

49 wp 211-19=.doc 3.

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 orally informed Court that in terms of those Consent Terms, the subject property is now in their possession and their grievance is fully redressed. They therefore, give no objection for quashing of FIR.

4.

Hence, accepting joint request, we make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2