Shri Anwar Ashfaq Hussein Ansari v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Gp And ORS

902-wp3714-22.doc vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2022.08.26 16:48:32 +0530 VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL WRIT PETITION NO.3714 OF 2022 Anwar A. Hussein Ansari

...Petitioner

V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

Ms.Jonifa D. i/b JRA Law Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.Ravi P. Kadam, AGP for the State - Respondent No.1. Mr.Tanaji Mhatugade for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Ms.Bhooja Shah i/b MK Juris Associates for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2022.

P.C. :- 1.

On 17th August, 2022, this Court recorded the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.5 on instructions from Mr.Ajay Suresh Kathuriya, who was present in Court that the offending structure is already demolished by the Municipal Corporation. Today, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 on instructions states that her client is not carrying out any fresh construction. Statement is accepted. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.5 on instructions, in our 1/2

902-wp3714-22.doc view nothing survives in this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed off as infructuous.

2.

In case if any false statement is made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.5, the petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings against the respondent no.5. There shall be no order as to costs.

(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.) 2/2