Natvar Parikh Industries Ltd. Through His Authorised Person Mr. V.P. Narayanan v. The State Of Maharashtra

by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date:

2022.12.19 11:45:34 +0530 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV 1/2 10.a66.06.doc Shiv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.66 OF 2006 Natvar Parikh Industries Limited ... Appellant Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents None for the Appellant.

None for Respondent No.1.

Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik APP for Respondent No.2-State. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED : 16TH DECEMBER 2022.

P.C:- 1.

No one is present today, even on earlier occasions i.e. 29th November 2022, and 6th December 2022, no one was present for the Appellant.

2.

Today, the matter is fixed under the caption "for dismissal". In fact, the complainant has completed his evidence and accused had started giving evidence. In the meantime the complainant remained absent and the complaint is dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai.

3.

Learned Advocate Shri Haresh Thacker is representing the Appellant and learned Advocate Mr. A. M. Bhalerao is representing Respondent No.2. When inquired with the Court Sheristedar, why message is not sent to them, it is told that they have not uploaded

2/2 10.a66.06.doc their information like mobile number, email-id, even though their names are there in Computer Information System (CIS). For that the Court cannot do anything. No purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, it is dismissed.

(S. M. MODAK, J.)