Shri. Gotiram Savliram Kale v. The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corp. And ANR

P.H. Jayani 10 AND 11.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 1106 OF 2019 Walmik Sakharam Kale and anr.

.....Petitioners v/s.

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and anr.

......Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 1292 OF 2019 Gotiram Savliram Kale .....Petitioner v/s.

Union of India and ors.

......Respondents Mr. Nikhil Pujari for the Petitioner in both Writ Petitions. Mr N.K. Rajpurohit, AGP for the State / Respondent No.2. CORAM: A.A. SAYED, AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2019.

P. C. :- .

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners in both the Petitions are only pressing the prayer clause (b) of the Petitions i.e., to consider and decide the representations of the Petitioners made to the Respondent No.1 - MIDC. Learned Counsel has tendered a copy of the order dated 13/08/2018 in Writ Petition (St.) No.11568/2016 (Shri. Shivram K. Kadlag and ors. v/s. The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Another) wherein, we are told, in respect of the same subject 1/2

P.H. Jayani 10 AND 11.doc matter, the said prayer was allowed.

2.

In the circumstances, we allow both the Writ Petitions in terms of prayer clause (b). The Petitions to stand disposed of. The said representations shall be decided by Respondent No.1 - MIDC within twelve weeks from receipt of copy of this order. Digitally signed by Preeti H.

Jayani Date:

2019.11.21 17:44:41 +0530 Preeti H.

Jayani (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) 2/2