Vidya D/O. Vijay Patil v. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee, Aurangabad Division And ORS.
wp-10297-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10297 OF 2017 Vidya d/o. Vijay Patil
...Petitioner
vs.
The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee and Others
...Respondents
Mr. Shreerang Bhandarkar a/w. Ms. Akanksha Helaskar and Mr. Pushkraj Deshpande i/b. Dewani Associates, for the Petitioner Mr. A.A. Kumbhkoni, Advocate General a/w. Mr. Ashutosh Gavnekar, Special Counsel and Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE :
OCTOBER 03, 2017 P.C.:
.
Rule. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith. 2.
Heard both the parties.
3.
The first Respondent - Caste Scrutiny Committee has rejected the caste claim of the Petitioner by the impugned Order dated 1st September, 2017. The Petitioner has assailed the said order inter alia on the ground that just and proper opportunity of hearing has not been afforded to the Petitioner in accordance with the relevant Rules. It is the contention of the Respondents that in view of the Orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Vishal Parekar 1/2
wp-10297-2017.doc Committee was required to decide the claim of the Petitioner in a time bound manner, on account of which it was not possible for the committee to strictly comply with the schedule prescribed by the relevant Rules.
4.
Be that as it may, without going into the merits and demerits of the aforesaid and other contentions raised by both the sides, by consent of the parties, the impugned order dated 1st September, 2017 passed by the first Respondent committee is quashed and set aside.
5.
The Petitioner undertakes to appear before the first Respondent Committee on 9th October, 2017 at 11.00 a.m. without insisting for issuance of notice in accordance with law and decide the validity or otherwise of the caste claim of the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible and endeavour to do so by 28th October, 2017. The Respondent Committee shall do so afresh uninfluenced by any observation and/or conclusions contained in the impugned order.
6.
All contentions of both the sides on merits are kept open.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2