Sangita Pandhurang Jadhav v. Prashant Pandhurang Jadhav And ANR.

1 909-wp-2987.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2018 Sangita Pandurang Jadhav ... Petitioner

Versus

Prashant Pandurang Jadhav and others ... Respondents .....

Mr. Anup Lahoti for Petitioner.

Ms. Rekha Musale i/b Mr. Nitin L. Rajguru for Respondent No.1. .....

CORAM : K. K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 27th JULY, 2018.

P. C.:

1.

Ms. Rekha Musale, learned Counsel submits that she has an instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.2 and undertakes to file Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2 during the course of day. Office to accept the same. 2.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and respondents. Both the learned Counsel submit that the dispute between the parties has already been settled amicably. They tendered the consent terms before this Court, the same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

Shridhar Sutar

2 909-wp-2987.18.doc 3.

In view of settlement of the dispute between parties amicably, both the learned Counsel seek leave to dispose of the writ petition.

4.

Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of in terms of compromise. No order as to costs.

( K. K. SONAWANE, J.) Shridhar Marutirao Sutar Shridhar Marutirao Sutar Date: 2018.08.01 16:13:17 +0530 Shridhar Sutar