Akshay Uttam Jagadale v. The State Of Maharashtra

BA 136-17 (Prod).doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.136 OF 2017 Akshay Uttam Jagadale .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.P.M.Patil, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

13.06.2017 P.C.

.

Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

A praecipe dated 13th June, 2017 has been filed by the learned counsel for the Applicant for Speaking to the Minutes of the Order dated 11.04.2017.

3.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that inadvertently, in the cause title of the aforesaid Order instead of 'Akshay', it has been typed as 'Ashok'.

4.

Accordingly, in the cause title of the Order dated 11.04.2017, instead of 'Ashok', it should be read as 'Akshay'. Ordered accordingly.

BA 136-17 (Prod).doc 5.

Rest of the Order dated 11.04.2017 to remain as it is. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)