The State Of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Amer Shakil Ahmed Shaikh And ORS

16a. cri appa 84-17.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 84 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 49 OF 2017 The State of Maharashtra ..

Applicant

Versus

Mohd. Amer Shakil Ahmed Shaikh & Ors.

..

Respondents ...................

Appearances Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh APP for the State / Applicant Ms. Tahera Qureshi Advocate for Respondent Nos. 10 & 14 Mr. Asif Naqvi a/w Mr. Yakub Shaikh Advocate for Respondent No. 2 ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : MAY 5, 2017.

P.C.:

1.

Heard learned APP for the State of Maharashtra (ATS), learned counsel for respondent Nos. 10 & 14 and learned counsel for respondent No. 2. None appears for other respondents through served.

jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

16a. cri appa 84-17.doc 2.

This is an application for condonation of delay caused in filing Criminal Appeal (St) No. 49 of 2017 against acquittal of respondent Nos. 1 to 20. The delay is of 109 days. 3.

In view of the averments made in the application and in the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that the delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned. 4.

The application is disposed of.

[ M.S. KARNIK, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2