Faisal Fayyaz Sayyed v. State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 06-ABA-144-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.144 OF 2022 Faizal Fayyaz Sayyed .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

• Mr.Mohd. Saeed Asgar Moghul, Advocate for Applicant. • Ms.Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 20th JANUARY 2022 (through video conferencing) P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP on instruction of the Investigating Officer makes a statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the Applicant and it would be sufficient if he co-operates with the investigation, including subjecting himself for medical examination.

Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2022.01.21 13:34:15 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR 2.

The statement is recorded and accepted.

Nesarikar

2 / 2 06-ABA-144-22.odt 3.

In view of this statement, learned counsel for the Applicant does not press this application. He makes a statement that the Applicant will co-operate with the investigation and also will make himself available for medical examination. This statement is also recorded and accepted.

4.

In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this application, as it is not pressed.

5.

The application is disposed of as such.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)