← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/435/2020rule absolute

Mangesh Vishram Shinde And ORS v. Meghana Mangesh Shinde @ Samidha Sushil Waghmare And ANR

2020-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari2 pages

49-wp-435.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 435 OF 2020 Mr. Mangesh Vishram Shinde and Ors.

.... Petitioners

Versus

Mrs. Meghana Mangesh Shinde and another.. Respondents Mr. Raviraj Gamare for the petitioners.

Adv Sampada Kini for respondent no. 1.

Mr.K.V. Saste, APP for the respondent State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & NITIN R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 25, 2020 P.C.:

Petitioners are present with their advocate while respondent no. 1 is present with her advocate.

2.

In the matrimonial dispute registered as Petition No. A/2010/2018 in 4th Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, consent terms for divorce have already been filed by the parties and those proceedings have been converted into one for grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent.

3.

Respondent no.1 has filed affidavit separately giving no objection for quashing of the criminal prosecution instituted by nilegaonkar 1/2

49-wp-435.2020.odt her.

4.

When enquired she has expressly stated that she has not claimed any alimony and does not need the same. In view of this express statement and request reiterated by her, we make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) nilegaonkar 2/2