The State Of Maharashtra v. Abhijit Vijay Patil

ssm 1 3-appln44.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2016 The State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.

Abhijit Vijay Patil ....Respondent.

Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Applicant.

Mr. Amin H. Solkar for Respondent.

CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 1st MARCH, 2019.

P.C.:- Heard the learned APP for the Applicant-State. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent opposes the prayer for condonation of delay. We have perused the averments made in the Application.

In view of averments made in paragraph Nos. 2 and 3 of the Application, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). (A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) 1/1