Chayya Dipak Solvande And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Sherla V.

6_IA.157.2021.doc VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SHERLA Date: 2021.09.09 10:11:20 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SHERLA CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.157 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.444 OF 2020 Chayya Dipak Solvande & another ... Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Vijay Biru Pujari & others ... Appellants Vs.

State of Maharashtra & another ... Respondents Mr.Y.S. Singh for the Interveners / Applicants Ms.Rati Sinhasane i/b Mr.Umesh Mankapure for Appellants Mr.K.V. Saste, APP, for Respondent - State Mr.Rohan Hogle i/b Mr.Meghdeep Oak for Respondent No.2 CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATED: SEPTEMBER 8, 2021 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This application is preferred by the Applicants, who are witnesses to the alleged incident, for intervention in the Appeal. The appellant has impleaded Respondent No.2, who is the first informant. Respondent No.2 is represented by Counsel.

6_IA.157.2021.doc 2.

In the aforesaid backdrop, the application for intervention does not deserve to be entertained. However, the interveners are at liberty to assist the leaned Counsel for Respondent No.2 in advancing their submissions in opposition to the Appeal. 3.

Intervention Application accordingly stands disposed off. (N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)