Shri Dineshchandra Jethalal Joshi v. Shr Ikailash Eknath Gavli

p3) cac39-17-corrected.doc sas

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2017 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.605 OF 2016 Dineshchandra Jethalal Joshi ..Applicant.

V/s.

Kailash Eknath Gavli ..Respondent.

Mr.B.K.Raje for the Applicant.

Mr.Vinay Dubey i/b. Mr.Rahul Kadam for the Respondent. CORAM : N.M.Jamdar, J.

DATED : 23 January, 2017 P.C. :- Not on board. Taken on production board by way of praecipe.

2.

By this application, extension is sought of 8 weeks. By order dated 6 December, 2016 after hearing the Applicant, at his request, 8 weeks time was granted. At that time, that request was opposed by the learned counsel for the Respondent, therefore, such extension cannot be casually granted. The Applicant already had 1/2

p3) cac39-17-corrected.doc two months time which is sufficient enough to contest the matter further. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the only indulgence that can be granted to the Applicant is to continue the ad-interim order for a period of three weeks from today. Order accordingly. Civil Application is disposed of. (N.M.Jamdar, J.) 2/2