Bharat Babu Solanki v. Union Of India Represented By The General Manager

Rane 1/2 sr.32 th March, 2022.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 726 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1968 OF 2006 BHARAT BABU SOLANKI } APPLICANT V/S.

UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER } RESPONDENT * * * * Mr. Rahul Jalan i/by. Mr. M.B. Singh, Advocate for the applicant in IA-726-2022 and for respondents no.1 to 3 in FA.

Mr. Chetan C. Agrawal, Advocate for the appellant in FA and for respondent in IA-726-2022.

Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J.

Friday, 25th March, 2022.

P.C. :

1) In view of the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT 2) Consequential amendments to be carried out NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2022.03.28 11:55:13 +0530 within two weeks.

Rane 2/2 sr.32 th March, 2022.

3) In view of the fact that, respondents no.1 and 2 have expired, the Registry shall pay interest to the respondent no.3 of his share therein, in terms of Clause-8 of the order dated 22nd August, 2006 passed in Civil Application No. 599/2005.

4) Application is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

5) The appellant shall carry out amendment in the Appeal memo in terms of this order forthwith. (Sandeep K. Shinde, J.)