← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12824/2016disposed off

Jay Hanuman Shikshan Sanstha Belavale Khurd And ANR. v. Shri. Jaysing Gajanan Patil And ORS.

2019-04-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

20. wp 12824-16.doc DDR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12824 OF 2016 Jay Hanuman Shikshan Sanstha Belavale Khurd & anr.

..Petitioners vs.

Jaysing Gajanan Patil & ors.

..Respondents ....

Shri N.V. Bandiwadekar a/w. Shri Vaibhav Kumbhar I/b. Shri Sagar A. Mane for petitioners.

Shri Prashant Bhavake I/b. Shri Umesh Pawar for respondent No.1.

Shri K.S. Thorat, AGP for respondent No.2.

....

CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.

DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2019 P.C. :

Learned Counsel for petitioners submits that they are willing for notional reinstatement of respondent No.1 in terms of the order passed by the School Tribunal.

2.

Learned Counsel for respondent No.1, on instructions of respondent No.1 who is personally present in the Court, submits that he is agreeable to such a notional reinstatement but with continuity of service. He submits that he 1/2

20. wp 12824-16.doc won't press his claim for back- wages and gives up his right to claim any back-wages. The affidavit-cum-undertaking on behalf of the respondent No.1 is taken on record and marked 'X'. 3.

The Management will submit a proposal for treating respondent No.1 as surplus and for absorption if there is a vacancy within a period of 4 weeks. The Education Officer (Secondary), Kolhapur, to decide the said proposal within a period of 6 weeks thereafter.

4.

The petitioner to notionally reinstate the respondent No.1 with continuity of service but without back-wages and submit proposal in terms of paragraph 3 above. Writ Petition is disposed of.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) 2/2