Naresh Singh Sumer Singh Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

* 1/2 * 42-WP-253-2013.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.253 OF 2013 Naresh Singh Sumer Singh Thakur ....Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.394 OF 2013 Krishna Sunder Devendra

...Petitioner

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Arun Rajput, Advocate for Petitioners.

Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent-State. ****** CORAM :- R.M.SAVANT & CORAM :- R.M.SAVANT & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 20TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

20TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

P.C. :- P.C. :- The learned counsel for the Petitioners states that The learned counsel for the Petitioners states that during the intervening period when the Petitions stood dismissed for during the intervening period when the Petitions stood dismissed for non-prosecution and their restoration, charge-sheet has been filed non-prosecution and their restoration, charge-sheet has been filed by the investigating agency. Therefore, he seeks withdrawal of the by the investigating agency. Therefore, he seeks withdrawal of the above Petitions to take appropriate recourse as provided under the above Petitions to take appropriate recourse as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Petitions, accordingly, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Petitions, accordingly, Shivgan

* 2/2 * 42-WP-253-2013.doc allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate recourse. If allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate recourse. If any application is filed for discharge, the same would be tried on its any application is filed for discharge, the same would be tried on its own merits and in accordance with law.

own merits and in accordance with law.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (R.M.SAVANT, J.) Shivgan