Jignesh Shantilal Chitroda And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

61-cri-wp-497-20.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 497 OF 2020 Jignesh S. Chitroda & ors.

... Petitioners V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and ors ... Respondents ---------------- Mr. Sachin V. Takkar for the Petitioners.

Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State. Mr. Amogh Khadye i/b Mr. A.G. Dolas for Respondent No.3. ----------------

CORAM

:

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 20, 2020.

P.C.

1] Respondent No.3-complainant is present with her advocate. The petitioners are present with their advocate. APP appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2] Parties are jointly requesting for quashing of FIR and consequential criminal case.

3] FIR is under sections 498-A, 406 and 34 of I.P.C. 4] Matrimonial discord between the parties is amicably settled. The consent terms are accordingly, fled before this Court.

Dinesh Sherla 1/2

61-cri-wp-497-20.doc 5] Respondent No.3 states that she has agreed to those terms.

6] The consent terms give custody of children to petitioner No.1. Respondent No.3 is not entitled to any amount. She has stated that she has not claimed any ornaments. 7] As respondent No.3 has agreed to terms of settlement and is making request jointly with the petitioners, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause "1.". Consequential charge-sheet dated 27th April 2019 is also quashed and set aside.

8] Accordingly, Rule is made absolute.

(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Dinesh Sherla 2/2