Ramesh @ Raju Kakasaheb Gaikwad v. State Of Maharashtra

PMB

11. ia 206.23.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 206 OF 2023 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3079 OF 2021 (THROUGH JAIL) Digitally signed by PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE Date:

2023.03.03 14:38:41 +0530 Ramesh @ Raju Kakasaheb Gaikwad ..Applicant VS.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE Adv. Priyanka H. Chavan for the Applicant.

Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State.

Mr. J. R. Dhanawade, PSI, Vikhroli Police Station present. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : MARCH 3, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

This is an application through jail. The order was passed on 22/07/2022 releasing the applicant on bail. The application through jail was filed even before the applicant could avail of the facility of the order dated 22/07/2022. In paragraph 9 of the order, it is noticed that it was one of the contention of learned counsel for the applicant that as the applicant has created a reign of terror in the locality, the interest of the complainant and his family members will be 1/2

PMB

11. ia 206.23.doc served, if such kind of stringent conditions is imposed on the applicant.

3.

I have gone through the order. The condition is justified and needs to be maintained considering the criminal antecedents.

4.

The application is disposed of.

5.

I appreciate the assistance rendered by Advocate Priyanka H. Chavan who appeared on behalf of the applicant.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 2/2