Shri. Pravin Dattatray Jambhulkar v. Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division And ORS.

901.CAO.22-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 22 OF 2018 IN Review Petition (ST) NO. 1861 OF 2018 IN Writ Petition No.8750 of 2016 Shri. Pravin Dattatray Jambhulkar ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Shri Pravin Dattatray Jambhulkar ..Petitioner

Versus

Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune And Ors.

...Respondents

....

Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Amol Gatne, Ajinkya Udane, Ranjit Shinde, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Sachin Kankal, AGP, for Respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. V.V. Pai, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

....

CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 09th FEBRUARY, 2018 [IN CHAMBER AT 2:35 P.M.] P.C.

1.

Heard Mr.A.V. Anturkar, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Sachin Kankal, learned A.G.P. for respondents No.1 & 2State and Mr.V.V. Pai, learned Counsel for respondent No.4, at length. Notice to respondent No.3 is dispensed with as respondent No.3 did not appear despite service when Writ Petition No.8750/2016 was disposed of on 4.5.2017.

1 / 2

901.CAO.22-18.doc 2.

For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Hence, delay of 229 days caused in filing Review Petition is condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) with no order as to costs. Order accordingly.

(R.G. Ketkar, J.) Deshmane (PS) 2 / 2