← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/422/2021allowed to be withdrawn at admission stage

M/S Siddhanath Construction Through Its Proprietor Mr. Balasaheb Erande v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And ORS

2021-08-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan2 pages

1-693-21-CWP-C=.doc Uday S. Jagtap

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 693 OF 2021 ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 694 OF 2021 M/s. Viraj Constructions Through Partner Dnynu Hanmant Jadhav and Ors.

.. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra Through Chief Secretary and Ors.

.. Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 422 OF 2021 ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION (ST). NO. 1543 OF 2021 M/s. Siddhanath Construction Through its Proprietor Balasaheb Erande .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary and Ors.

.. Respondents .....

Mr. Vinod Sangvikar i/b Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the petitioner in WP 493/2021 and 694/2021 Mr. Pralhad Paranjape a/w Mr. Manish Kelkar, Druti Datar for the petitioner in WP 422/2021 and WP(st.) 1543/2021 and for respondent no.6 in WP 693/2021 and 694/2021 Mr. R.P. Kadam, AGP for respondent -State Mr. Abhay A. Jadhavkara i/b D.D. & Abhijit Associates for respondent no.5 in WP 693/2021 and 694/2021 CORAM : K.K. TATED & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.J.

DATED : 10th AUGUST, 2021 by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date:

2021.08.11 10:51:31 +0530 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP

1-693-21-CWP-C=.doc P.C.

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submit that they have received instructions from their respective clients to withdraw the petitions unconditionally. To that effect, a praecipe is moved by the learned Counsel for the petitioners. The same is taken on record. 3.

The Writ Petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn. 4.

No order as to costs.

(PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)