Anil Ramrao Gogawale And Others v. Ankush Vijaykumar Mehta And Others

2-CA-89-13.doc 05.01.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2013 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2010 Shri. Anil Ramrao Gogavale and others .. Applicants

Versus

Shri. Ankush Vijaykumar Mehta and others .. Respondents Mr. A. B. Tajane, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Pankaj Das, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 5 to 9. None for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J.

DATE : 05th JANUARY, 2015 P.C.

1.

The above Civil Application has been filed for restoration of the above Civil Revision Application against Respondent Nos.2 to 9. The Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution on account of the conditional order dated 19.03.2012 passed by the learned Registrar, Judicial-II of this Court. The said order became operative as the Respondent Nos.2 to 9 were not served with the notice in the above Civil Revision Application. In so far as Respondent No.2 i.e. Pune Municipal Corporation is concerned, the same is represented by advocate Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni. In so far as Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are concerned, they have been served by BGP.

2-CA-89-13.doc 05.01.2015 publication pursuant to the Court's order dated 22.08.2014 and in so far as Respondent Nos.1 and 5 to 9 are concerned, they are represented by advocate Mr. Pankaj Das. Hence, the unserved Respondents have all been served. The Civil Application therefore, would have to be allowed and is accordingly, allowed. The Civil Revision Application is accordingly restored against Respondent Nos.2 to 9. Place the Civil Revision Application for admission on 19th January, 2015. Civil Application is disposed of. [R.M. SAVANT, J] BGP.