Rajagopalan Sridhar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

7.aba119.15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 119 OF 2015 Rajagopalan Sridhar & anr.

... Applicants.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Sachin Deokar, advocate for Applicants.

Mr. A.H. Ponda, advocate for intervenor.

Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : FEBRUARY 10, 2015 P.C.:

Learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions submits that the applicant no. 1 has been arrested. Hence, prayer for grant of pre-arrest has become infructuous. Hence, the application in case of applicant No. 1 is concerned, is disposed of as infructuous. As far as applicant No. 2 is concerned, the learned Counsel seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is Talwalkar 1/2

7.aba119.15.sxw granted in the interest of justice. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn in case of applicant No. 2. The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2