Darasing Arjun Sukale v. State Of Maharashtra

1/2 917 BA-314-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2022 Darasing Arjun Sukale ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...

Mr.Ganesh Gupta for the Applicant.

Mr.S.V.Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. ...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 11th OCTOBER, 2022 P.C:- 1.

This is a second bail application, the frst being withdrawn on 27/11/2020. On re-hearing the counsel and reappreciating the material in the charge-sheet, I reached the same conclusion to the effect that there is suffcient material, prima facie, indicating the guilt of the applicant, as the panchnama clearly reveal that apart from the printer, the original currency notes with the identical numbers of the counterfeit notes, which were recovered from the co-accused, are also seized. Apart from this, the incriminating material in part of the counterfeit notes, being printed on the papers, are also recovered.

I am not inclined to entertain the application, despite the fact of long incarceration of the applicant, since the applicant M.M.Salgaonkar

2/2 917 BA-314-22.doc is facing charge under Section 489(D), which is punishable with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fne.

2.

In the wake of the above, the application is rejected. 3.

Let the concerned court make an endeavour to conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar