Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 12-aba-194-22(f)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2022

1. Mr. Naishad Subodhchandra Parikh

2. Smt. Seena Naishad Parikh .... Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil i/b. Ms. Heena Suvarnkar for Applicants. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State/Respondent. ______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 1st FEBRUARY 2022 (through Video Conferencing) P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP makes a statement that the investigating agency does not intend to arrest the applicant No.2 in this case. It would be sufficient if she attends the police station as and when called and co-operates with the investigation. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicants argued the case for the applicant No.1 for some time. However, when I expressed my disinclination to grant relief to the applicant No.1, learned counsel Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2022.02.02 10:54:38 +0530 for the applicants prays for unconditional withdrawal of this VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Gokhale

2 / 2 12-aba-194-22(f) application on behalf of the applicant No.1. Permission is granted. 3.

Considering this situation, following order is passed:

ORDER

(i) In the event of arrest of the Applicant No.2 in connection with C.R.No. I 290 of 2019 registered with Vasai Police station, the applicant No.2 is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing P. R. bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

(ii) The Applicant No.2 shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when called and shall cooperate with the investigation.

(iii) The application on behalf of the applicant No.1 is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of as such.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)