Ankush Maniram Jaiswal And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

42. WP 556-2020.doc by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2022.09.23 14:28:55 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 556 OF 2020 Ankush Maniram Jaiswal and Ors

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors

...Respondents

Mr. Bhavesh Parmar a/w Mr. Rajesh Sahani & Ms. Reshma Nair i/b Divmani Shukla for the Petitioners.

Mr. Hemant Ingle for the Respondent No.5.

Mrs. A.S.Pai, P.P. a/w Mr. J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

DATE : 22 nd SEPTEMBER, 2022 P.C. :

1.

After arguing for sometime, when the Court was not inclined to grant the relief i.e. of quashing of the proceedings under its inherent jurisdiction and under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, learned Counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a discharge application before the Wakodikar 1/2

42. WP 556-2020.doc appropriate Court.

2.

The petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

3.

If an application seeking discharge is filed by the petitioners before the trial Court, the learned Judge to consider the said application on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of the aforesaid petition. 4.

Needless to state that all contentions of the parties on merits are kept open.

5.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar 2/2