Anil Gorakhnath Ghodake v. State Of Maharashtra

S.S.Kilaje 50-IA-250-24-BA-3435-23.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3435 OF 2023 Arun Gorakhnath Ghodake ... Applicant In the matter between :

Arun Jalindar Gawade ... Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

...........

Mr. Narayan Rokade, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D. H. Haldankar, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Sharat T. Bhosale, Advocate for intervenor in IA/250/2024. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 10th APRIL, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for the intervenor. 2.

Learned counsel for the intervenor submits that the intervenor is a first informant and brother of the deceased. The respondent has filed application for bail hence intervenor wants to intervene the said application.

3.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that APP is appointed to represent the matter hence not necessary to hear the intervenor as learned APP is going to argue the matter, hence requested to reject the application.

1/2

S.S.Kilaje 50-IA-250-24-BA-3435-23.doc 4.

I have heard both the learned counsel. Intervenor is the first informant and brother of the deceased, hence it is necessary to give him chance to put his side along with the learned APP. The intervenor can assist the learned APP.

5.

In view of above, I pass following order.

ORDER

i.

The Application is allowed.

ii. The intervenor is permitted to assist the learned APP. by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2024.04.15 14:09:47 +0530 SONALI SATISH KILAJE (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2