Saroj Praveen Desai v. Mahesh Govardandas Sheth

1 CAC 100-15 in CRAST 2119-15.doc-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.100 OF 2015 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.2119 OF 2015 Saroj Praveen Desai.

] ... Applicant/ (Orig. Plaintiff)

Versus

Mahesh Govardandas Sheth.

] ... Respondent/ (Orig. Defendant) Mr. Nitin P. Dalvi for Applicant.

CORAM :- M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE :- AUGUST 31, 2015 P. C. :- 1.

The learned Counsel for Applicant states that service has been complete and necessary affidavit of service has also been filed. 2.

In this case, although the delay is of one year and 284 days, sufficient cause has been indicated in paras 2, 3 and 4 of the Civil Application. The Respondent has not appeared in the matter and filed any reply opposing the condonation of delay. In any case, the application states that the Advocate for Applicant did not inform the Applicant about disposal of the proceedings before the Court and further, the Applicant also lost her husband and considerable time was URS

2 CAC 100-15 in CRAST 2119-15.doc-16 spent in collection of papers and information about the pending litigation. Accordingly, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

3.

There shall be no order as to costs.

4.

Place the Civil Revision Application for admission on 08/09/2015 (on Supplementary Board).

(M. S. SONAK, J.) URS