Mrs. Sushila Krishna Kulbhi And ORS v. Mr. Vinod Matadin Chauhan And ORS

22.AO494_2017.doc Vidya Amin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 494 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 632 OF 2017 IN A.O. NO. 494 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 633 OF 2017 IN A.O. NO. 494 OF 2017 Mrs. Sushila Krishna Kulbhi & Ors.

... Appellants/Applicants Vs.

Vinod Matadin Chauhan & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocate for the appellants. Mrs. Madhuri More, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 and 5/BMC. Mr. Vinay Tiwari, Advocate for respondent no. 1. CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: 21st August, 2017.

P.C.:

This Appeal from Order is directed against the order dated 22nd December, 2016 thereby refusing the ad-interim relief in Notice of Motion No.3752 of 2016 in L.C. Suit No. 134 of 2011. 2.

The ad-interim order was passed on 22nd December, 2016 and I am informed that the Notice of Motion is not yet heard finally. Considering the gap of 8 months, the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the Notice of Motion finally till 10th October, 2017. The respondents may file affidavit-in-reply to the Notice of Motion before the trial Court, if any, within two weeks from today. 1 / 2

22.AO494_2017.doc 3.

With this, Appeal from Order is disposed of. Civil Applications are also accordingly disposed of.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2