Shri. Sachin Bapurao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Thru The Prin. Secretary, Dept. Of School Edu. And ORS

bdp 20-wp-2087.20.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2087 OF 2020 Shri Sachin Bapurao Patil ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents ****** Mr. Ashish P. Pawar for the Petitioner.

Mr. N. C. Walimbe, AGP for the State-Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Anup M. Hingane i/by Mr. Gaurav Nankar for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

****** CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2021.

P.C. :- .

Matter is on board and is mentioned out of turn at 3:15 p.m. 2.

Rule. Learned AGP waives service for the respondent nos. 1 to

3. Mr. Hingane, learned counsel waives service for the respondent nos. 4 and 5. Heard finally by consent of parties. 3.

By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondent no.3Education Officer to consider the proposal and grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner as clerk w.e.f. 1st June, 2012 and to release grant-in-aid for payment of salary to the petitioner with all consequential benefits.

bdp 20-wp-2087.20.doc 4.

The Management submitted a proposal dated 20th January, 2014 for approval to the appointment of the petitioner as clerk w.e.f. 1st June, 2012. The said proposal is not yet considered by the respondent no.3Education Officer. 5.

Learned AGP appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 on instruction states that the proposal dated 20th January, 2014 shall be considered within a period of eight weeks from today. Statement is accepted.

6.

The respondent no.3-Education Officer shall take decision on the proposal dated 20th January, 2014 submitted by the Management for appointment of the petitioner as clerk w.e.f. 1st June, 2012 within a period of eight weeks from today. The said decision would be communicated to the petitioner as well as to the Management within a period of one week from the date of passing of decision. 7.

Writ Petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. [R. I. CHAGLA, J.] [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]