Shwetali Indranil Adnaik v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

upk apl-79-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders.

Registrar's orders.

Mr.Harshad E.Palwe for the Applicant.

Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the State.

...

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 12TH JULY 2016 P.C.:

.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, on instructions, states that a report was submitted by the Police on investigation seeking `B'-summary and the learned Magistrate has accepted the report. 2.

If the Applicant is aggrieved by the order of the learned Magistrate granting `B'-summary, the remedy of the Applicant is to challenge the said order in accordance with law. In view of acceptance of `B'-summary, at this stage, the prayer made in this Application under section 482 of the Code of

upk apl-79-15 Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing the FIR cannot be entertained.

3.

Subject to what is observed above, the application is disposed of. All contentions on merits are kept open.

(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)