Aditya Ashok Jogani v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Wakodikar 1/2

68. APL 85-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 85 OF 2017 Aditya Ashok Jogani ...applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

...Respondents

---- Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the applicant.

Dr. F.R.Shaikh, APP for the State.

---- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R.BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 16TH JANUARY, 2020.

P.C.:

Counsel for petitioner states that petition has been presented for quashing of FIR with consent of respondent No.2. According to him, the diamonds have been returned to respondent No.2 and therefore, he has agreed not to press the prosecution. 2.

Learned APP, upon instructions, informs that there are three more identical cases against the petitioner. In view of this statement

Wakodikar 2/2

68. APL 85-2017.doc made by Learned APP, we refuse to intervene in extra-ordinary jurisdiction.

3.

Petition is disposed of.

(N. R. BORKAR, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)