Santosh Appasaheb Kharade And ORS v. Archana Santosh Kharade And ANR

1 907.56.16 appp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION 470 OF 2015 Santosh Appasaheb Kharade and others .....Applicants V/s.

Archana Santosh Kharade and another ....Respondents Mr. N. J. Patil i/b Amey N. Patil Advocate for applicants Ms. N. R. Rane i/b Mr. N. P. Deshpande for respondents Mr. A. S. Patil APP for the State.

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : JANUARY 22, 2016.

PC :

Heard.

2) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties. 3) In criminal application no. 470 of 2015, a submission was made before this court that trial has commenced and the examination-in-chief of the complainant/applicant has been completed. Today, present application has been filed seeking modification of the order on the ground that learned counsel for the complainant had inadvertently stated so and in fact, the proceedings Hindu Marriage Petition No. 125 of 2011 had commenced and ism

2 907.56.16 appp the examination-in-chief was recorded.

4) Hence, the observations in para 3 of the order dated 18/01/2016 are hereby written off. It shall be read as examination-in-chief and crossexamination was completed in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 125 of 2011. Order stands modified accordingly.

5) Rule made absolute in the above terms.

6) Application stands disposed of.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism