Vikas Namdeo Gosavi v. The State Of Maharashtra

912-BA-297-2024.DOC 2024:BHC-AS:4366 Sonali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2024 Vikas Namdeo Gosavi ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Aashish Satpute, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Ganesh Raykar, P.S.I. attached to Pimpri-Chinchwad Police Station, Pune present.

CORAM

Madhav J. Jamdar, J.

DATED:

30th January 2024 PC:- 1.

On 24th January 2024, this Court has passed the following order:- "1. Mr. Satpute, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant on instructions states that only one witness has been examined.

2. Ms. Shinde, learned APP, on instructions states that 7 witnesses have already been examined.

3. Both the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties seeks time to take written instructions.

4. Stand over to 30th January 2024. To be shown first on supplementary board".

(Emphasis added) 2.

Today, Mr. Satpute, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant states that he has verified the record and also he is

912-BA-297-2024.DOC having Roznama which shows that 7 witnesses have been examined. He states that earlier statement was made by him on instructions that only one witness has been examined is not correct.

3.

Ms. Shinde, learned APP states that only 2-3 witnesses have remained to be examined and that an endeavour will be made to conclude the trial expeditiously.

4.

Accordingly, the learned Trial Court is requested to conclude the trial expeditiously by 31st March 2024.

5.

The Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh Bail Application, if the trial is not concluded by 31st March 2024. 6.

The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly. (Madhav J. Jamdar, J.)