← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12634/2022disposed off

Arvind Vishnu Deodhar Decd Thr Lhrs v. Nandkumar Vishnu Deodhar Decd Thru Lhrs And ANR

2023-04-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal3 pages

1 / 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5172 OF 2022 Nandkumar Vishnu Deodhar (since deceased) through legal heirs Anuradha Nandkumar Deodhar & Ors.

.... Petitioners versus Arvind Vishnu Deodhar & Ors.

.... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.12634 OF 2022 Arvind Vishnu Deodhar & Ors.

.... Petitioners versus Nandkumar Vishnu Deodhar (since deceased) through legal heirs Anuradha Nandkumar Deodhar & Ors.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. Rajaram P. Lote, Advocate for Petitioners in WP/5172/22. • Mr. Mayuresh D. Modgi, Advocate for Petitioners in WP/12634/22 and for Respondent Nos.1A to 1D in WP/5172/22.

• Mr. C. G. Gavnekar a/w Ashutosh Gavnekar a/w Rohit Parab, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2A to 2C in both WPs.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 17th APRIL 2023 Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2023.04.18 14:32:22 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Nesarikar

2 / 3 P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Rajaram P. Lote, learned counsel for the Petitioners, Mr. Mayuresh D. Modgi, Advocate for Petitioners in Writ Petition No.12634 of 2022 and Mr. C. G. Gavnekar, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.2A to 2C.

2.

The parties to the Writ Petition No.5172 of 2022 have entered into consent terms. The Petitioners were the Original Defendant Nos.1 to 4. The Respondent Nos.1A to 1D are the legal representatives of the Original Plaintiffs and the Respondent Nos.2A to 2C are the legal representatives of other Defendants in Special Civil Suit No.174 of 1999 before the 2nd Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan. The suit was for partition. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the Petition was filed at the stage of challenging Commissioner's report. In view of the settlement between the parties resulting into the Consent Terms; the parties shall approach the Trial Court for getting final decree in the suit. In

3 / 3 view of this common statement, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of the Petition i.e. Writ Petition No.5172 of 2022. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as withdrawn. 4.

The other Writ Petition i.e. Writ Petition (ST) No.1824 of 2020 (Writ Petition No.12634 of 2022) is filed by the Respondent No.1(a) to 1(d) in Writ Petition No.5172 of 2022, who are parties to the Consent Terms and there is reference in paragraph No.10 that even Writ Petition (ST) No.1824 of 2020 is covered by the Consent Terms and therefore learned counsel for the Petitioner in Writ Petition (ST) No.1824 of 2020 seeks withdrawal of this Petition. Permission is granted and even this Petition (i.e. Writ Petition No.12634 of 2022) is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)