← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/99/2016

All India Council For Technical Education And ANR. v. Dr. Nanasaheb Parulekar Sakal Charitable

2019-02-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.A. Sayed,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

1/2 902-cao-99-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2016 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.1489 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4387 OF 2015 ...

All India Council For Technical Education ....Applicant In the matter between:

All India Council for Technical Education ...Review Petitioner V/S Dr. Nanasaheb Parulekar Sakal Charitable Trust ....Respondent ...

Mr.Sanjay S. Jadhav for the Applicant/Review Petitioner. Ms.Sanaya Kapadia for the Respondent No.1.

Mrs.M.S.Srivastava, AGP for the State.

...

CORAM : A.A. SAYED & K.R.SHRIRAM, JJ.

DATED : 27 FEBRUATY 2019 P.C.:

At the outset, learned Counsel Mr.Jadhav states that he has no instructions to appear for the Applicant/Review Petitioner, but he appeared today since his name appeared today in the cause-list. He states that he has returned the papers long ago to the Applicant. Uday.P.Kambli 1/2

2/2 902-cao-99-16.doc 2.

Having considered the Review Petition, we find that the Petition itself is infructuous. Therefore the question of considering the Civil Application also does not arise.

3.

Accordingly, both the Civil Application and the Review Petition are disposed of.

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli 2/2