Qureshi Rizawana Ayaj v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

510.WPST-1833-20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Stamp) NO. 1833 OF 2020 Qureshi Rizawana Ayaj

...Petitioner

Versus

State Of Maharashtra And Ors

...Respondents

....

Mr. Vasant B. Ghorpade, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. P.J. Gavhane, AGP, for the Respondent - State. Ms. Sabiha Shaikh i/b. Amul Jawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. ....

CORAM : K.K. TATED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 07th FEBRUARY, 2020 P.C.

1.

Not on board. At the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, the matter is taken on production board for urgent orders.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the recovery certificate bearing No.4118/2018 dated 31.3.2018 issued by the Authority for the sum of Rs.6,17,369/-.

4.

When this Court declined to entertain the present Writ Petition on the ground of alternate efficacious remedy available to 1 / 2

510.WPST-1833-20.odt the petitioner, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. To that effect, he has given in writing, which is taken on record and marked ' X' for identification.

Same is accepted.

5.

Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.) Deshmane (PS) 2 / 2