Rashid Ali Mir And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 40 APL 81 -2016.doc Sequeira

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2016 Mr.Rashid Ali Mir and others ... Applicants Vs State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Manisha B.Gawde i/b Shivaji M.Patil, for Applicants. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for Respondent-State.

Mr.M.H.Sayed, for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

Date : 7 December, 2018.

P.C. :

As per orders passed by this Court on 21 March 2018, the Respondent No.2-Complainant appeared before Registrar, Judicial (II) on 4 April 2018, with her Advocate. Her identity was established and then contents of Affidavit dated 13 April 2017 were explained to her. After she accepted the same to be true and correct she has counter signed the Affidavit again in presence of Registrar, Judicial (II).

2.

Counsel for parties are present before the Court and state

2 40 APL 81 -2016.doc that accordingly matter is settled and hence the FIR be quashed along with the Criminal Case.

3.

In view of these developments, Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(Sarang V. Kotwal, J.) (B.P.Dharmadhikari, J.)