← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/819/2024dismissed as withdrawn

Rakesh Rabindranath Samanta v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2024-04-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prithviraj K. Chavan2 pages

29-IA-819-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 819 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3156 OF 2019 Rakesh Rabindranath Samanta ...

Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...

Respondents .....

Mr. M.M. Chandnani i/b S. K. Atique Ur. Rehman, for the Applicant.

Mr. Mayur S. Sonavane, APP, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2-State. Ms. Aruna Pai, for Respondent No.3.

Ms. Sheetal Mundhe, PI, L. T. Marg Police Station, present. .....

CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATED : 23rd APRIL, 2024.

P.C.

Learned Counsel for the applicant-original complainant seeks cancellation of bail of respondent No.3-Amar Kumar Chanak on the ground that the said respondent had threatened the witness viz. Adhir Ghorai, resident of Kolkata. The said Adhir Ghorai is also said to have lodged First Information Report against Amar Kumar Chanak with Baranagar Police Station, Kolkata. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Rekha Patil REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2024.04.24 17:28:46 +0530

29-IA-819-2024.doc Learned Counsel for respondent No.3- Amar Kumar Chanak, however, invites my attention to the copy of the said FIR dated 1st January, 2024 which does not reveal the name of respondent No.3. Prima facie, the submission made by the complainant appears to be false.

It is informed by learned Counsel for respondent No.3 that an FIR alleged to have been lodged with Baranagar Police Station is in respect of co-accused Anil Maji and Prabir Maity. A copy of the CCTV footage relied upon by learned Counsel for the applicant at page Nos. 135 to 139 even does not clearly depict the person being respondent No.3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant-original complainant, therefore, seeks to withdraw the application. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] Rekha Patil