Sachin Madhukar More v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

44-aba-245-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 245 OF 2022 Sachin Madhukar More ..Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents ---- Mr. Balasaheb Ligade, for the Applicant.

Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for the Respondent / State. ---- Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2022.03.19 12:08:17 +0530 MAMTA AMAR KALE CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J.

DATE : 14 MARCH 2022 P.C.

.

Heard.

2.

Learned APP points out that the matter arises out of the proceedings under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and therefore, the Anticipatory Bail Application may not be maintainable.

3.

Faced with this, the learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application, with leave to challenge the said order in an Appeal. He also requests for extension Mamta Kale page 1 of 2

44-aba-245-2022.doc of interim protection for a period of two weeks, in order to enable the Applicant to file an Appeal.

4.

In such circumstances, the Criminal Application is disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

5.

Interim protection, already operating, to continue for a period of two weeks.

C.V. BHADANG, J.

Mamta Kale page 2 of 2