Majnuali Rabiul Sardar v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 24 BA-347.20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.347 OF 2020 Majnuali Rabiul Sardar ..

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...

Mr. Sandeep Mishra for the Applicant.

Mr. S.H. Yadav, A.P.P. for the State.

...

CORAM

: SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 31ST JULY, 2021.

P.C:- 1.

This is the second Application filed by the Applicant since his first Bail Application was withdrawn on 20/11/2017 before this Court. Learned counsel concedes to the fact that this Application was filed after filing of the charge-sheet. 2.

Learned A.P.P., on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, states that on 23/07/2021, the charge has been framed and the matter is now slated for further steps before the Sessions Court on 13/08/2021. AJN

2/2 24 BA-347.20.odt 3.

The C.R. is registered under the POCSO Act in the year 2016 and the Applicant came to be arrested on 26/11/2016. It is high time that the trial must commence and conclude keeping the time-frame set out in the special statute. Since the charge is framed, request is made to the Special Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, to take up the trial preferably on day-to-day basis and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within a period of one year from the date of framing of the charge. 4.

Learned counsel for the Applicant is satisfied with the aforesaid direction and expresses that he would withdraw the present bail application.

5.

The Bail Application is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such.

6.

If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the Applicant will be at liberty to renew his application for bail. [SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.] AJN