← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2484/2014disposed off

Shri. Subhash Fakira Chaudhari v. Sudhagad Education Society, Through Chairman / President And ORS

2021-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Surendra Pandharinath Tavade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte2 pages

11.WP.2484.2014.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Aarti G.

Palkar Digitally signed by Aarti G. Palkar Date:

2021.02.26 14:38:35 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.2484 OF 2014 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3013 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2484 OF 2014 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4043 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2484 OF 2014 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.822 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2484 OF 2014 Shri. Subhash Fakira Chaudhari ....Petitioner/Applicant vs.

Sudhagad Education Society & Ors.

....Respondents Mr. S.G. Kudle for the Petitioner.

Smt. P.N. Diwan, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Dhanashree Bhate i/by Mr. Mandar Limaye for Respondent No.1.

CORAM

: S. C. GUPTE AND SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.

DATE : 24 FEBRUARY 2021 P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 and learned AGP for Respondent No.4-State. 2.

The petition is ripe for fnal hearing. Rule is issued in the year 2018. The subject matter of controversy in the present petition concerns approval Aarti Palkar 1 / 2

11.WP.2484.2014.doc to the Petitioner's appointment as Assistant Teacher. The Petitioner claims to have been appointed as Assistant Teacher in Respondent No.2-School vide appointment letter dated 12.06.2007. The Respondent-Management's proposal for approval to the Petitioner's appointment has been pending for a long time. The Petitioner has approached Respondent No.3 with a request for considering approval to his appointment expeditiously. On these facts, the petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing Respondent No.3-Education Ofcer (Secondary) to take an appropriate decision on the pending proposal of the Petitioner's appointment in a time bound manner.

3.

Accordingly, Rule is made absolute, and the writ petition is allowed by directing Respondent No.3-Education Ofcer (Secondary) to consider the proposal for approval to the Petitioner's appointment as Assistant Teacher as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six weeks from today. In case of processing the proposal in respect of the Petitioner's appointment, if any documents or further compliance are called for from Respondent Nos.1 and 2, the latter shall render necessary assistance and submit documents or make compliance, as the case may be.

4.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. 5.

In view of disposal of the present writ petition, the connected civil applications as well as interim applications in this writ petition are disposed of accordingly.

(SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J) (S.C. GUPTE, J.) Aarti Palkar 2 / 2