Sneha Sandesh Ghosalkar v. Union Of India And ORS

spb/ 7apl96-15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2015 Sneha Sandesh Ghosalkar ... Applicant.

V/s.

Vikas Khanolkar & Anr.

... Respondents.

--- Ms. Shweta Sangtani, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the State- Respondent No.2. --- CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI,J.

DATE : 04th MARCH, 2015 P.C. :

Heard learned Advocate Ms. Shweta Sangtani for the Applicant and the learned additional public prosecutor Mrs. Mane for the State.

Perused the impugned order. The learned Magistrate has refused to consider the application for travelling abroad on merits as there was stay of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel submits that the stay has now been vacated. In view thereof, in my opinion, the applicant shall move the learned Magistrate afresh.

Borey 1/2

spb/ 7apl96-15.sxw The learned Magistrate shall decide the application on merits, if such an application is made by the applicant. The learned Magistrate is expected to decide the application within a period of two weeks from the date of making the application. The present application is disposed of accordingly. Parties and trial Magistrate to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

(JUDGE) .....

Borey 2/2