← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/275/2021disposed off

Javed Nasir Shaikh And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

2023-07-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak2 pages

9. ABA 275 of 2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 275 OF 2021 Javed Nasir Shaikh and Anr.

...Applicants vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 336 OF 2021 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 275 OF 2021 Ms. Abel Eliza Zacharia ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***** None for the Applicant in ABA 275 of 2021.

Mr. H. J. Dedhia - APP for the Respondent-State Adv. Prem Tanna i/by Adv. Sharad Rai - Advocate for intervenor PSI Ujwal Arke - Mira road Police Station ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

24th JULY, 2023 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the intervenor and learned APP. Today Officer had gone for Cyber training. 2.

On 01/02/2021, this Court has adjourned the matter to 05/02/2021 for passing the Order. On 05/02/2021, adjournment by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2023.07.26 15:28:07 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

9. ABA 275 of 2021.doc was sought on behalf of the intervenor and then matter is adjourned to 12/02/2021. There was an Order passed not to arrest the Applicant till then. On 12/02/2021, learned Advocate for the Applicant and intervenor submitted that they want to explore the possibility of the settlement. Hence interim relief was continued till next date i.e. 08/03/2021.

3.

Thereafter, matter was not listed for long period and it was listed on 05/06/2023. A submission was made on behalf of the first informant that they are in verge of the settling the matter. On 26/06/2023, no one was present on behalf of the Applicant. Hence after hearing the learned Advocate for the first informant this Court has vacated the interim protection granted earlier and kept this matter today for dismissal.

4.

There was direction given to the learned Advocate for the first informant to communicate that Order to learned Advocate for the Applicants. He has done that and submitted that today no one is present on behalf of the Applicants.

5.

Matter is dismissed for non prosecution.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2