← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/216/2004compromisedconsent terms

Meerabai Sitaram Jadhav v. Varubai Trambak Pawar

2015-12-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka1 pages

ppn 1 21.sa-216.04.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.216 OF 2004 Meerabai Sitaram Jadhav ..

Appellant Vs.

Varubai Trambak Pawar (since deceased) 1a. Anusaya Suresh Pawar & Ors.

..

Respondents --- Mr.Ashish Pyasi a/w Ms.Ekta Tripathi i/by Mr.Abhijeet Shinde for the appellant.

Mr. Santosh Vishwakarma for the respondent nos.1(a) to 1(d). Mr.Shantanu Chandratre for the respondent nos.2(a) to 2 (e) and 3 to 6. --- CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 9th December 2015 P.C.

.

Matter is on board and mentioned out of turn. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties have tendered Memorandum of Understanding (consent terms) dated 20th October 2015 duly signed by the parties and/or have affixed their thumb impressions. 3.

Learned counsel for the parties state that each of the signatories to the consent terms are explained the contents of the consent terms in Marathi. Their signatures are also identified by their respective advocates.

4.

Consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Second appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs.

R.D. DHANUKA, J.