Miraj Abdul Mohid Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra

BA 262-18.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2018 ( Through Post ) Miraj Abdul Mohid Khan .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Ms Saima Ansari, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

17.04.2018 P.C.

.

Learned APP on instructions states that the trial has commenced and that one witness has been examined and the second witness is in the witness box. She further submits that about 17 more witnesses are to be examined.

2.

Considering the fact, that the trial has commenced, it is not necessary to consider this Application on merits. Accordingly, the Application is dismissed, however, the trial of the Applicant is expedited. Learned Judge shall conclude the case as expeditiously as possible and in any event within nine months from the date of receipt of

BA 262-18.doc this order. If for no fault of the Applicant the trial does not conclude within the stipulated period, the Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh Application seeking his enlargement on bail which will be considered on its own merits. It is made clear, that this Application has not been heard on merits.

3.

The Application is disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)